Judge finds no prima facie case against Razak Baginda

By Debra Chong

SHAH ALAM, Oct 31 - High Court judge Datuk Mohd Zaki Yasin concluded that the prosecution in the Altantuya Shaariibuu murder trial had failed to prove a prima facie case for abetment against politicalanalyst Abdul Razak Baginda.

The judge said that the contents of Abdul Razak's affidavit, submitted at the beginning of the trail, should have been taken into full consideration and given its due weight as evidence in the investigation.

In the affidavit, Razak Baginda explained how he got to know the first accused, Inspector Azilah Hadri through another police officer, a DSP Musa Safri, and the relationship between the three of them, as well as with P. Balasubramaniam, the private investigator he had hired to protect him against Altantuya's harassments.

"In my view, once the essential elements of the abetment i.e. by instigation, by conspiracy and by aiding, and in the context of this case, the death of Altantuya is not proven on the basis of prima facie evidence, any other inferences and doubts that may have arisen must be resolved, as is trite, in favour of the accused person," Justice Zaki observed, explaining why he ruled in favour of Razak Baginda.'

He added: "It is not for the court to call for the defence merely to clear or clarify such doubts."

Justice Zaki ruled that Razak Baginda be acquitted and gave him a full discharge.

"What is required of this court to decide at this stage, is whether on the available evidence, a prima facie case against the first, second and third accused has been established in respect of the respective charge preferred against each of them."

Speaking of Abdul Razak's affidavit, he ruled that "since this affidavit is now forming part of the case for the prosecution, it is my view therefore, that its entire contents including the exculpatory parts thereof must be given the due weight as it is given to the rest of the evidence for the prosecution.

Therefore, the question of deferring or suspending the consideration of its weight to a later stage of the proceeding does not arise."

"Upon my aforesaid rulings and maximum evaluation with all the other evidence available in totality, I am satisfied that there is prima facie case for the first accused (Insp. Azilah bin Hadri) and the second accused (Corp. Sirul Azhar bin Hj Umar) to answer as charged. I therefore now call upon both the first and second accused person to enter their defence. As for the third accused (Abdul Razak bin Abdullah), I find there is no prima facie case for him to answer his charge. He is therefore acquitted and discharged forthwith," he ruled.

Comments (8)Add Comment

Write comment

busy
 

Latest Comments

Hadi reiterates PAS remains in Pakatan
PAS has gained a lot in Pakatan. Nizar was made the MB despite PAS having only 6...
Federal govt frustrated with Penang govt
Anak Kedah - can you substanstiate your claim or is it just hearsay - I for one ...
PAS men slam unrepentant Abdul Aziz
Aziz has done a good job. PAS has to an alternative to UMNO. PAS should listen t...
Who holds the PAS strings?
Mohd Khairil asked a question which is a peril to the party. Now, it is to say o...
Hishammuddin: Time for MCA to ask Najib ...
"The people in the end will become bored with us (BN component parties) and look...
Who holds the PAS strings?
The issue is simple. Do not equate Muslims with Malays as it would not be right...
Who holds the PAS strings?
In a true democratic state, minority rights are given privileges ... the strong...

Sponsored Links