SHAH ALAM, March 24 — Paid trips to Cambodia and Indonesia, cash payments, a mass wedding for converts, and expensive gifts for VIPs, all in the name of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), dominated day two of a public inquiry into the Wives of Selangor Elected Representatives Charity Organisation (Balkis).
Today, it was the turn of Permodalan Negri Selangor Berhad (PNSB) chief executive officer Datin Khairiyah Abu Hassan to be “grilled” by the Selangor Select Committee for Competency, Accountability and Transparency (Selcat), over funds which was provided to Balkis since 2002.
Khairiyah, who was accompanied by four aides, disclosed that it was a common practice for the state subsidiary to adhere to all “request” for funds from Balkis, which amounted to between almost RM500,000 to RM1.6 million, annually.
Khairiyah told the committee headed by Selangor speaker Teng Chang Khim that as a state subsidiary it adopted a “compromising attitude” as they wanted to support the state in all projects which improved the
image of the administration.
Khairiyah, who was deputy CEO in 2002, disclosed that it was “usual practice” for Balkis officials to make verbal requests for project funds, and it was not unusual for the payments to be made in cash.
During the inquiry she said the “instructions” were sometimes made over the phone but she later retracted and used the term ‘request’ instead which prompted Teng to remind her that she was testifying under oath.
She admitted she had a close relationship with former Balkis president Datin Zahrah Kechik, who is the wife of former Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Khir Toyo,and added there was no committee to scrutinise the
“request” for funds or how the money was used.
Khairiyah said all requests were approved by the PNSB board collectively.
In 2002, PNSB funded a journey of repentance and self-realisation (Keinsafan) for Balkis members. A total of RM82,000 was paid and the money was used to food, accommodation and humanitarian projects as well as an allowance of RM3,000 for a reporter.
Khairiyah said RM38,000 was dispensed in cash and PNSB did not receive a receipt for the money.
In the same year, Balkis also received RM250,000 of which RM100,000 was in cash, to run a motivational camp for SPM students.
Khairiyah said she is not sure what the cash was used for and did not know who ran the course or why the money needed to be paid in cash.
In 2003, PNSB allocated RM1.65 million to Balkis of which RM148,280 was used to fund a mass wedding of 51 couples who were new converts at Dewan Belia and Sukan in Shah Alam.
Almost RM90,000 was spent on food for the estimated 1,500 guests at the wedding and Khairiah admitted there was no proper documentation on how the rest of the money was spent.
“It is negligence and carelessness on our part,” she admitted.
Khairiyah was at a loss to explained why huge amounts of cash was being dispensed to Balkis over the year and who received the money.
In 2004, PNSB paid RM3,600 for a “Summermen” suit for its then chairman Dr Mohd Khir Toyo as a souvenir for attending a Chinese New Year function, contrary to General Orders that gifts should not cost more than RM1,000 .
In the same year PNSB paid RM16,000 for Balkis members to go on a trip to Bukit Tinggi, Indonesia.
Meanwhile in 2006, PNSB paid RM50,000, in cash, for the opening of Complex Wawasan Balkis in Shah Alam, RM13,000 for food and a singer for a Buka Puasa dinner and RM25,000 for several tables at a
Balkis charity dinner.
In 2007, PNSB paid RM338,547.97 for the Balkis annual sports event of which RM33,000 was used to buy uniforms for participants.
Teng remarked that PNSB had functioned like a cashier to Balkis and added the Select Committee was concerned with the lack of corporate governance by the state subsidiary.
The inquiry continues tomorrow.

written by donplaypuks, March 24, 2009
Malaysian Assoc for cows and Cars, take note and act today!!
http://donplaypuks.blogspot.cpm
written by YOUNG_VOICE_out, March 24, 2009
i vividly remembered Khir toyol transfered all of the funds from BALKIS and said that it was the organisation's money. this is totally the contrary of what has been written in the news above.
it is not balkis money, its the rakyat money!!
demand back all of the moneyyy!!!
written by Tapah, March 24, 2009
written by sgbertih, March 24, 2009
Somehow I could not believe that balkis members and the word "insaf" can be formed into a same sentence until now.
Hee,hee,hee,hee........
written by Eskay, March 24, 2009
If these dealings are not corrupt practices, we don't know what are.
So Mr. Toyol, your party ethics committee can find you clean but be ready to spend time in the slammer where you rightfully deserved to be.
written by Abraham, March 24, 2009
written by John, March 24, 2009
written by Judge, March 24, 2009
They will have to seek for their master opinion first before making any move. If it involves UMNO, will put to last priority. If someone talks truth on UMNO, top priority.
So we will expect Toyol will enjoy the corruption freedom as UMNO members will not be charged under the law, not even any judge dare to sentence them.
How about the real killer of Altantuya, the whole world already know still wanna to cover paper with fire?
written by Bobby, March 24, 2009
written by Gome, March 24, 2009
written by PM, March 24, 2009
MACC, where are you guys? Time to act without fear or favour. This is the kind of stuff you should be investigating, and not on some cows and a car, and a story spinned by Toyol.
written by Alan Goh, March 24, 2009
wives..all these issues will remained unknown had Pakatan Rakyat not
formed the Selangor State Govt.
It really amazes me how these UMNO goons wives under the guise of
Balkis,can squandered so much of the rakyat money as though it belongs
to their grandfather.We have the corrupted,shameless ex-MB talking about
morality.After losing the Selangor state to PR,these goons were hiding and
shredding documents for three days and nights.
Now this ex-MB is eyeing the UMNO youth post and at last count,he was
leading in the race.An immigrant from Java,how did he managed to classify
himself as Malay and Bumiputera which qualifys him to be UMNO member.
YB Dato Najib,good luck to you and UMNO,if you have these goons around
during the 13GE..
written by politickler, March 24, 2009
It's clear mis management
written by H J Angus, March 24, 2009
Seriously, this is a case of negligence and a lack of proper controls. How can they disburse public funds without proper receipts?
written by Richard-Budak Taiping, March 24, 2009
written by mamacarey, March 24, 2009
written by unbelievable, March 24, 2009
written by confused, March 24, 2009
MACC, it is time to charge them......get back all the money, freeze their assets or at least ask them to repay back.....
written by Mary Tan, March 24, 2009
written by For All Malaysians, March 24, 2009
PNSB was Balkis's ATM.
Balkis and her team should be jailed for all the fraud, misappropriation, CBT, looting, plunder and rape of the PEOPLE's money.
MACC do your homework and act fast. Don't tell me that MACC is under their payroll or sleeping on their jobs.
Freeze their assets including Toyol and recover the Malaysians' monies.
written by Joebuudy, March 24, 2009
All donations and ex gratia payments of state subsidiaries must get approval from the state executive council. In the state subsidiaries, ther are mostly crooks, they most probably drink free EY chocolate drink at tea break.
written by orang perak, March 24, 2009
written by Ruben, March 24, 2009
Who cares if the country goes to the ground? As long as you can look like a hero waving a keris and cheered on by a bunch of racists, and make money doing it, heck, why not?
Welcome to Barisan National.
written by mha1952, March 24, 2009
written by looes74, March 24, 2009
However, I bring you the attention of this MAREVA INJUNCTION
Of course, the court must be neutral and not seen to be supporting either party. Perhaps, Selangor government can study on this
MAREVA INJUNCTION
The Mareva injunction (variously known also as a freezing order, Mareva order or Mareva regime), in Commonwealth jurisdictions, is a court order which freezes assets so that a defendant to an action cannot dissipate their assets from beyond the jurisdiction of a court so as to frustrate a judgment. It is named for Mareva Compania Naviera SA v International Bulkcarriers SA [1975] 2 Lloyd's Rep 509, decided in 1975, although the first recorded instance of such an order in English jurisprudence was Nippon Yusen Kaisha v Karageorgis in 1975, decided very shortly before the Mareva decision; however, in the UK the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 now define a Mareva order as a "freezing" order. It is widely recognised in other common law jurisdictions and such orders can be made to have world-wide effect. It is variously construed as part of a court's inherent jurisdiction to restrain breaches of its process.
It is not a security (Jackson v Sterling Industries Ltd), nor a means to pressure a judgment debtor (Camdex International Ltd v Bank of Zambia (No. 2)), nor does it confer a proprietary interest in the assets of the judgment debtor (Cretanor Maritime Co Ltd v Irish Marine Management Ltd). However, some authorities have treated the Mareva injunction as an order to stop a judgment debtor from dissipating his assets so as to have the effect of frustrating judgment, rather than the more strenuous test of requiring an intent to abuse court procedure. An example of the former would be paying off a legitimate debt (Iraqi Ministry of Defence v Arcepey Shipping Co SA), whereas an example of the latter would be hiding the assets in overseas banks on receiving notice of the action.
It is recognised as being quite harsh on defendants because the order is often granted at the pre-trial stage in ex parte hearings, based on affidavit evidence alone. A Mareva injunction is often combined with an Anton Piller order in these circumstances. This can be disastrous for a defendant as the cumulative effect of these orders can be to destroy the whole of a business' custom by freezing most of its assets and revealing important information to its competitors.
A freezing order will usually only be made where the claimant can show that there was at least a good arguable case that they would succeed at trial and that the refusal of an injunction would involve a real risk that a judgment or award in their favour would remain unsatisfied (Ninemia Maritime corporation v Trave Schiffahrtgesellschaft m.b.H und Co.K.G [1983] 1 WLR 1412).
Similar provisions are now required to be available in the rest of Europe, under Article 9(2) of the European Union Directive on the enforcement of intellectual property rights, approved in April 2004.
written by Sick&Tired, March 24, 2009
written by rakyat malaysia, March 24, 2009
written by yong chee keong, March 24, 2009
written by tonton, March 24, 2009
Is it legal to transfer out the money?
Is it possible to get back the money for more useful use?
Any body check on bakti too?
written by ThrowShoes, March 24, 2009
MACC pls show that u are not a doggy agency !!!
written by Aries, March 24, 2009
No wonder they were so sore at losing the state government to the opposition, as they also lost the CASH COWS and all other "one-stop convenience machineries and apparatuses".
For far too the rakyat had been treated with contempt and utter disrespect. The rakyat were expected to be law abiding, subservient, pushed and shoved at the government and their agencies behest.
But the government and their agents were all the time treated to and had jolly great times, all at the expense of the sweat and toil of the rakyat. It was a known fact that the state government organised many functions, events and programs to allow their staff and family members and cronies to garner their support which would allow them to perpetrate and perpetuate their sickening and lavish lifestyles. It is such greed and abuse of government funds which endear them to their similarly greedy supporters.
Worse still, they are done in the name of charities!
The rakyat cannot and would not tolerate such utterly irresponsible and unthinkable acts. Any or all proofs should be used to take all those responsible for the misdeeds to the court of law to be judged.
written by ahmad sarkun, March 24, 2009
written by blur, March 24, 2009
written by Jayenjr, March 25, 2009
It is good that we continue to surface the truth for as much as we can - so that we will never lose sight of what type of crooks this UMNO and BN guys are.
written by Puchong Malay Boy, March 25, 2009
written by kenu, March 25, 2009
written by Jason, March 25, 2009
written by YNWA, March 25, 2009
written by seberang, March 25, 2009
written by Dr Janet F Lee, March 25, 2009
The future of the nation needs to be in the hands of people like KJ...not KT who may go and pilfer on the national scale if voted in!
No wonder they banned you from the GA. Like me, many were hoping we could get a a fair report on the goings on from your website!
Somehow, I still believe we'll get a better coverage from you than the rest despite this ' minor' shackle!
Janet
written by Former BN Supporter, March 25, 2009
hhhm....why am I not surprised? Why is MACC not acting on it?
I am certainly SURPRISED why its only so few cases..? Pls dig more.
written by Rage against the Machine, March 25, 2009
you can have all the press you want, you can have a huge committee hearing about the whole fiasco. however, the fact remains that a lot of action taken against Malaysian (bumiputra) companies and charities like Balkis consist of hearings, maybe warnings and a small fine. these companies constantly get off the hook.
PLEASE maintain your credibility in these hearings. the people are fuming over these allegations because we knew they were true and we lament the length and delays in taking proper, decisive, legal action against the perpetrators.
you have the proof, now PROSECUTE. Balkis, Toyo, his wife, PNSB, everyone should be accounted for. if they are let off scot-free once again, then its clear that any corrupt company can be above the law. MALAYSIA IS NOT A BANANA REPUBLIC!
written by longjaafar, March 25, 2009
For a start, a detailed, objective and unbiased report must be done, after the conclusion of the enquiry.
The sultan needs to be briefed and the first copy of the report be given to him. Upon his consent, only then will the report be made public, with each and every MP (including BN MP's) getting a copy.
The idea is to spread the news as wide as possible.
If it is felt that any party is culpable, then an official report be made to the police and MACC, and they be made to investigate. Pressure to investigate can come from Pakatan MP's through various measure, not excluding their speeches in parliament. The topic must be kept alive, because MACC will try their best to hush it up as 'no case' and 'no further investigation necessary'.
written by Nina Wansem, March 25, 2009
See, I'd have all the money in the world, if I was a wealthy girl
No man could test me, impress me, my cash flow would never ever end
Cause I'd have all the money in the world, if I was a wealthy girl
Think what that money could bring
I'd buy everything
Clean out Vivienne Westwood
In my Galliano gown
No, wouldn't just have one hood
A Hollywood mansion if I could
Please book me first-class to my fancy house in London town
written by Bobby, March 25, 2009
written by ajax, March 25, 2009
written by siew eng, March 25, 2009
What about the MPPJ football club? Any hanky-panky there? During my brief stint at an ENGO, my colleague's project with the local council tak boleh jalan because cannot meet the boss who's forever off somewhere outstation or overseas with the football club. Boleh investigate tak?
written by EG, March 25, 2009
written by zambris, March 25, 2009
written by LeeZ, March 25, 2009
written by H J Angus, March 26, 2009
The state government should take speedy action to recover taxpayers' monies and dismiss/punish those irresponsible officers who were involved as this is give a strong message to all public servants.
written by ESWARA, March 30, 2009
That is why BN is anxious to take control of all the other States sooner than possuible to prevent such hickory pokery from comming to the attention of the public. Men placed in position of trust by the Rakyat have openly skimmed them ably supported by dummies who claim to be top Civil servants. Even the lowest tom fool knows how to handle public accounts compared to these so called top Officers of the Corporations and the Agencies.





I'm Speechless....