KUALA LUMPUR, July 6 — The Shah Alam High Court has declared deceased art director Mohan Singh a Muslim at the time of his death, despite protests from his Sikh family, in a ruling which could reignite fresh controversy over Islamic conversion cases.
Today’s ruling comes a week after the Malay Rulers decided to put off until further study the Najib administration’s plans to amend some laws on conversions which would have gone some way in assuaging concerns especially from among the non-Muslim community.
The court ruled today that Mohan had converted to Islam and that the Syariah court had the jurisdiction to determine if he was still a Muslim when he died on May 25.
The Syariah High Court had on June 4 ruled that Mohan was a Muslim when he died and should be buried according to Muslim rites.
Syariah High Court judge Mohamad Khalid Shaee @ Shaii ruled that Mohan’s conversion was valid after hearing testimony from five witnesses and examining the documents brought before the court.
The order was issued following an application by the Selangor Islamic Religious Council (Mais).
Mohan was apparently also known as Mohammad Hazzerry Shah Mohan Abdullah. He was said to have converted to Islam in 1992 in Penang. However, the deceased’s family claimed that the 41-year-old who died of a heart attack, had neither converted nor practised Islam.
They said he had practised Sikhism and had performed the last rites for his late mother three years ago.
The family had filed for a judicial review here against the Sungai Buloh Hospital’s decision not to release the body to them to be cremated according to Sikh rites.
Six hours after the court decision, the hospital released the body for burial.
The body was then taken to the family home
Mohan's remains were taken to the family home for last viewing before it was sent to the mosque in Batu Caves for dressing and burial in Taman Selasih Muslim cemetery.
While it is customary for Muslims to bury their dead before the sun sets, Mais lawyer Haniff Abdulla told resporters Islamic law does not forbid burial after dark, saying the burial can be carried out as long as the grave diggers can see to dig the grave, even if they have to resort to using torches or car headlights.

written by dawud farquhar, July 06, 2009
written by Hafidz Baharom, July 06, 2009
In this case, we have testimony of 5 individuals and paper documents, against the word of his family.
Just what exactly were the documents presented?
From theNutgraph, it was said to be a document identifying Mohan as a Muslim signed by he himself. The family is saying that it's not his handwriting.
Was a handwriting expert brought forward to identify the authenticity of this evidence? I hope there was.
As heartbreaking as it is, if the evidence supports it, then it has to be true 'in the Syariah court'. However, should the 5 witnesses have been lying about their testimony, well, the Hereafter awaits.
written by Tuhan Sakti Dari Dunia Di Atas Bumi, July 06, 2009
Macam mana bukan Muslim nak hormat agama Islam kalau begini kuku besi sikap orang yg mempraktikkan Islam?
Mana kelembutan Islam? Setelah mati dan roh pun dah lama pergi, masihkah lagi fanatik agama mahu bertengkar mengenai mayat?
written by Rat Bat Blue, July 06, 2009
written by zackeye, July 06, 2009
What we often hear is that after deaths occur, the authorities start to go to court to take away the body. It is alright if the dead Muslim is a practising Muslim but what if the person has already left Islam. This will be a mockery of the system. In Islam, part of the zakat is allowed to help new Muslims. So use the money as prescribed by the religion rather that building expensive and elaborate mosques which could even be deemed as wasteful. Wastefulness is the work of syaitan.
written by Lou Reed, July 06, 2009
Which one is more important - the burial ceremony, or the actual practice of the believer when he's alive?
The family is mourning... why put further burden on their shoulder? They deserve more care... not another court case!
Be wise.
written by Joe Ang, July 06, 2009
Only in Malaysia do we have all these crap controvesy. It must have stamp from some misguided notion about something.
written by Burstaxon, July 06, 2009
This is about inheritance. You'll see hidden hands later denying any monies/assets to the rightful heir since they are still 'infidels'
written by cha so bi, July 06, 2009
written by Gautama, July 06, 2009
If he wasn't a Muslim but a practising Sikh, to whom will his properties go to? If he was indeed a Muslim, will it be the same persons or person?
Therein lies the truth.
written by rocky, July 06, 2009
I believe the high court is the better place when it involves issue of conversion of a non muslim. and cases need to be decided on proof not those that say that he was converted at his dead bed bla bla.
written by Pan, July 06, 2009
written by dominik, July 06, 2009
It is really a shame for going to court over a body especially when the other side has no relationship with the deceased except the so-called religion.
So much talk about the "do and don't" regarding conversion but nothing is implemented or passed. So who will suffer - The non-muslim members of families especially when then convert without letting their spouses know until they are dead and there is a tussle for the body.
What a shame. What a shame the whole episode has become!!!!!!!
written by superyoga, July 06, 2009
The stupid ignorant peole do not know how to take care of the Muslim Poor, Unwanted Malay Born Babies, Mat Rempit and what not. But they prefer to do this things to show they are VERY ISLAMIC.
Unfortunatly, they give Islam a Bad Name!!!
written by Sunny, July 06, 2009
My personal view is that if your mind and heart already belongs to certain God, it's doesn't matter what burial rites is being performed. Don't tell me if a devoted Muslim has been practicing Islam and lives according to Quaran, and just because he/she is not buried accordingly as a Muslim, he will not enter syurga.
written by No value, July 06, 2009
Islam is all. It is your new family. You can not leave.
written by Rakyat Supremacy, July 06, 2009
written by Mira, July 07, 2009
The problems does not lie with Islam, its the failure of the person to inform his/her family that he/she has converted, and laws must be amended to ensure this is the case!
written by tito, July 07, 2009
written by amoker, July 07, 2009
I do really find it strange. Can the islamic council provide a list of converts so I can check if I have converted? The latest case in Seremeban where the lady converted to get the custody of the 2 chldren were based on the testimony of 2 Islamic Chinese convertors who collaborated with each other. I dun expect the sultan to solve this. The non muslims will not find peace tll death.
written by luciai., July 07, 2009
i was there and had blog about it here with pictures:
http://lucialai.org/2009/07/07/body-snatchers-at-it-again/#more-3491
written by Moro, July 07, 2009
You talk about Islamic brotherhood, Islamic sisterhood.
Why brotherhood according to religion?
Where is the brotherhood amongst all men and women, regardless of religion or race?
Why always need to band together in tribes according to religion?
This shows the intolerance of your religious attitudes. Simple as that.
written by anti anarchist, July 07, 2009
You guys are welcome to discuss in any of thousand Islamic discussion forum..or reliable comparative religion website.. and you see the truth... Islam is the way of life, Islam take care of you even after your death... Islam don't make you separate from your family... Take Ridzuan Lee Abdullah for instant... or even DS Nizar family...
written by anti anarchist, July 07, 2009
Only religion can unite people... regardless his nationality, races, black, white, handicapped, Asian, European etc... That is fact
written by Hang Tuah 1, July 07, 2009
---
How did the court ruled that Mohan had converted to Islam???
On what basis was this judgment made???
One piece of paper - a document - a certificate of conversion in 1992???
I have lost my confidence in this judgment of the civil court.
The shariah court can determine if Mohan was still a Muslim when he died,
the civil court cannot determine -
How did the shariah court determine that Mohan died a Muslim????
What about all the testimonies of family members and friends????
There are hundreds of them who can testify -
But, these testimonies cannot be accepted in shariah court -
These people are non-Muslims, and they have not standing in shariah court.
Kangaroo court lah!!!!!
I have lost my confidence in this shariah court and its judgment.
Mohan was even married - after his supposedly conversion -
His marriage was not a Muslim one -
That tells you Mohan's conversion was a suspect - not genuine.
Was his conversion a forced one???
Was his conversion a false one???
I have lost my confidence in all Islamic religous authorities in Malaysia.
If this the brand of Islam and the talk about Islamic state,
I wish to oppose such an idea.
My heart goes to his family family.
Now they get nothing, all his estate are robbed.
written by Tony, July 07, 2009
written by a reformist muslim, August 08, 2009
there are two points, first I do not know why in Malaysia, a Malaysian can not marry another malaysian from different religion! A muslim should marry a muslim, a christian should marry a christian, things are different for Buddhist and Hinduism, anyhow still a huge no. of Malaysians are muslims and there are possibilities of love between any two human, in my own country any Iranian can marry other Iranian regardless of religion (as long as they are iranian) i do not understand why here in Malaysia, marriage is a force of converting.
I read an article in BBC that annually 7000 people convert to islam in Malaysia and more that 2000 of them are for the purpose of marriage only and they don't really believe in Islam, so why do not they (Malaysian authorities) let them marry without converting!
Same as convertig from islam! in no story and article in holy Quran says, you can not convert (Religious muslims if you disagree bring it to me :P ) and we have a lot of stories show in time of prophet himself many case of converting back happened! (remember those though times for islam, prophet did not prohibit it, now that islam is in a stable situation, they do not allow it, why?! simply because they are thirsty for power)
Now these authorities of islamic countries to make sure of their power, prohibit the conversion of islam, while Allah (the merciful) says in Quran, "There is no obligation in religion, we cleared the ways(you can choose among them and see the result in afterlife)
I hope they stop ruining the name of Islam!





It is as simple as that and that is the only correct way to go about solving this so-called 'conversion' issue.
Hence, the notion that a person who is called upon by Allah SWT to embrace Islam must first get permission from his/her family to do so and that he/she must first settle outstanding issues before they are allowed to embrace Islam is absolutely wrong.