Church renews bid to remove third parties from ‘Allah’ case

By Debra Chong

KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 14 — The High Court here will hear on Oct 14 the Catholic Church’s bid to prevent several Islamic bodies from interfering in its ongoing suit against the home minister’s ban on the use of the word “Allah” in its newspaper.

Judge Lau Bee Lan made the decision in chambers today.

Lawyer for the church, Porres Royan, told reporters that the church had filed an application at the High Court here to recall and set aside its earlier decision allowing some 10 state Islamic Councils as well as the Malaysian Chinese Muslim Association (Macma) to intervene in the case.

Judge Lau had on August 3 ruled that the state Islamic councils could intervene in the church’s suit against the home minister on the basis that their legal rights as advisers to the rulers, who sit as heads of Islam in their respective states, would be gravely affected by any decision taken by the court.

But Royan said the Federal Court, headed by Chief Justice Tun Zaki Azmi, had on Sept 3 ruled to bar the Selangor Islamic Council (Mais) from entering as an interested party in a dispute between the Shah Alam City Council (MBSA) and Bong Boon Chuen, together with 150 landowners, over Islamic burial land in neighbouring Selangor.

The top court’s most recent decision in Bong’s case sets an example for the High Court here to keep interveners out.

Lawyer for Mais, Abdul Rahim Sinwan, said the state Islamic councils would challenge the church’s second bid to remove them from intervening in the “Allah” case.

He pointed out that the Federal Court had made two conflicting rulings on whether or not interveners could be allowed in.

Abdul Rahim noted that the Federal Court had ruled to allow bodies to intervene in an earlier case.

He referred to a 2007 ruling in Staghorn vs Hong Leong Bank, which he claimed was similar to the Bong case, on a land issue and set the precedent for all courts to follow.

The bespectacled lawyer said the Islamic councils only had to show that they had a “direct legal interest” in the “Allah” case.

He said they had already satisfied that criterion, notably through the enactment of the “anti-propagation laws”.

The Catholic Church filed for a judicial review in mid-February against the home minister’s ban on it using the word “Allah” outside the context of Islam in its multi-lingual newspaper.

The home minister had threatened to shut down “The Herald” by taking back their annual publishing licence if the weekly insisted on using the word “Allah” to refer to the Christian God.

Comments (7)Add Comment

Write comment

busy
 

Latest Comments

Penang government declassifies minutes o...
Declassify EVERYTHING. Declare everyone's assets as well. The country belongs to...
‘I’m Sabahan, they treat me worse th...
DO NOT EXPEL. Instead use their votes to ensure PR's win. PR must promise that t...
A dept just to handle foreign workers
Dear Minister, The problem can only be arrested if you take the Immigration off...
PAS Kelantan serah pada Nik Aziz selesai...
Both the PBMK's CEO and RM65K gift are set to haunt TGNA for the rest of his nat...
Liow says to call off EGM II only if fre...
LTL, fresh election by this year, or in 6 months, or in 12 months or in many man...
Singapore cements military ties with US
Under a certain 13 point plan, Singapore will be re-assimilated by Malaysia. ...
The Apprentice: MCA
Liow Topshop should get ready to CLOSE SHOP. Period.

Sponsored Links