JUNE 24 – This is what we feared, Mr Prime Minister. That, when confronted with the choice of Malaysian unity or Malay unity, you would plump for the latter but attempt to wrap it as a option which would be consistent with your 1Malaysia concept.
That, when confronted with the politically easier and attractive choice of working together with Parti Islam Semalaysia (PAS), you would reach for tired clichés of working for the betterment of Islam and Muslims in the country, and relegate non-Malays to an afterthought, a footnote.
Non-Malays must have felt like bit players today reading comments from Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak, the man who promised that he would usher in a new era of equality for all Malaysians.
He appealed to PAS to reconsider the proposal to form a unity government with Umno, saying that the Islamic party should not allow political considerations to get in the way of uniting the Malay/Muslim community.
But what about the rest of the country? What about the Chinese, Indians, Kadazandusuns, Dayaks, Sikhs, Eurasians and others? What role will they play in a Malay unity government? Who will look after the interests of non-Malays? Will crumbs be tossed their way?
Najib attempted to assure non-Malays that they have nothing to fear but his answer only served to raise red flags.
“Just because there is a unity government doesn’t mean non-Malays will be neglected. They will still have a role,” he said today. How comforting?
Sorry, Mr Prime Minister, non-Malays do not want to be bit players. They do not want minor roles. Chinese, Indians and others do not want to be accorded second-class status.
They yearn to be treated as equals in the only home they have. Little possibility of that happening in a government dominated by Umno/PAS.
Mind you, this is not paranoia. If Umno and its institutions (read: Utusan Malaysia) are insufferable and arrogant with the power vested in them now, one can only shudder at the thought of now intolerant and blind to the rights of other Malaysians they will be with the heft of all Malay political power?

written by zikri, June 24, 2009
written by shaoks3, June 24, 2009
The more our false Rakyat PM harps on the UMNO-PAS unity talks, the more the people are going to reject the insignificant component parties in BN! Don't MCA, MIC, Gerakan, SUPP, and the rest of the parties in BN have a voice? Or, are they so completely insignificant that their voice(s) won't even mean anything in the UMNO-BN government? If that is the situation, isn't it time for all of them to tell our false Rakyat PM-UMNO that "enough is enough" - and just become Independent parties and speak out?
written by Ari, June 24, 2009
written by swipenter, June 24, 2009
written by No value, June 25, 2009
What is the point anymore? 1Malaysia is dead and I don't care enough to cry. I have to thank my Malaysia education for that.
written by SL, June 25, 2009
Maybe we all have a different perception on "equality". Equality means all human beings are treated equally in all terms regardless of their cultures, history, language, skin colours or watever. Equality does not mean that human beings are ONLY being treated equally when we all practice SIMILARITY in everything.
The concept of nationalism is a century old perception of nationhood during the 19th century. However, we are now living in 21st century, where you could hardly find everyone in a developed country to practice similar culture, languages or their people having similar history or even skin colours. Whether we like it or not, globalization is everywhere. What you could observe during your incident at America is just a scene, you could see people speaking different languages (Spanish, Mandarin, etc) easily in other part of the world where these are not the national nor dominant language of that particular geographical area.
Malaysia is unique due to its multicultures and diversity. Even when our tourism board promotes Malaysia as a tourist attraction, do you see them promoting culture or customs of a particular race? Maybe you could argue that not all non-Malay Malaysians do not practice the so-called Malaysian cultures, but who are we to define which is Malaysian culture? Culture is a concept which means it is abstract, cultures are formed by humans, and thus, we create the cultures and we are not created by the cultures.
Nevertheless, do you really think that non-Malay Malaysian could not speak or written the language well enough? You might need to think twice, Malaysians have advanced way ahead of what you could imagine. Even many "Bumiputera" could speak or understand at least a portion of language other than Malay and English, and many "non-Bumiputera/or so-called kaum pendatang by some racist jerks" could speak and write the national language better than the others.
Satu sekolah? I am sorry to say that this is just a not-so-wise plan in terms of education or even nation building. Have you seen all our government top officials send their children at local "sekolah kebangsaan" or even send their children to local "university kerajaan"? Satu sekolah? Even this could not be achieved for "sekolah menengah kebangsaan", after PMR, bright Bumiputera are sent to MRSM (Malaysian junior college) while majority of qualified non-Bumiputera are denied, after SPM, more are channeled to Kolej Matriculasi while non-Bumiputera again, being denied. So, are our government practicing "Satu sekolah"? Any right minded person will certainly doubt such double standard.
Let us be frank, "Satu sekolah" is a concept that would not flourish in Malaysian society whether you like it or not. Diversity is our strength, not the otherwise. Hence, it is better for the government to support all schools, regardless of SK, SJK, SMK, SMJK and not support half-heartedly. Recognize the contribution and quality of Private Chinese Independent School as Malaysia has lost their talents to foreign countries as our government alienated them and yet, we are shouting "brain drain" in Malaysia.
Equality is a concept and a fundamental right that would allow Malaysia to progress and deter people from mis-use their entrusted power by claiming to protect the "special right" of certain people. In addition, American society is founded based on equality in all which is practiced by majority of the countries in the world. A citizen is a citizen, no classification based on "skin colours, language, religions, cultures, history, etc"
So, are we living in 21st century Malaysia, or otherwise?
written by swipenter, June 25, 2009
Let me ask you the following 2 questions:-
1. Are the Peranakans "Malay" enough to be accepted as "equals" by the majority of this country ?
2. If not, which areas are the Peranakans not 'Malay" enough?
written by The Watchman, June 25, 2009
Remember folks ... vote the Umno flers out of government in the next general election.
written by zackeye, June 25, 2009
Only the orang Asli can claim that they are the original inhabitants of this country. The rest are all immigrants. Some are older and others are new. Why our fore fathers migrate to this country? This country gives good and bearable climate, the land is fertile, rich in resources, the rulers are kind and accommodating and few natural disasters. Every race has contributed to make this country a success.
Of course there are communities that prefer to assimilate into the majority community by adopting the language like the Babas, Chitis, the Indian Muslims. Thais etc. The assimilation is done not due to compulsion but rather voluntarily for economic and political advantages if any.
Those who do not wish to assimilate can continue to practise their culture and pursuits with very little interference from other communities. This is something that we should treasure. Very few countries in this world including the so called developed world tolerate differences to the maximum that our people tolerate.
If the so called social contract is wrong then we should sit down and continue to write and amend the contracts to come up with a practical and relevant one according to the time and need of the country. No contract should be rigid and timeless.
Switzerland is one example where 4 major languages are accepted as official and the communities refer to them as Swiss and not German, Dutch, French or Italian. Their country is landlocked and not so rich in resources but the people are resourceful and excell in whatever they are doing. This is one example that we should emulate.
We should not have many road blocks to progress but should open more highways instead.
written by ToWatever, June 25, 2009
I do not agree. Living in this colorful nation of ours, we stand as "unique" because of our diversified culture and living in harmony despite of our differences. Just because I like Japanese food or Korean food, does that make me less Chinese? Just because I like to eat nasi lemak, does that make me less Indian?
The reason we have stayed "divided" is because of the race card played by our politicians. Why can't we see our similaries among ourselves than our differences.
How is the Eastern European not being treated equally? Is the US government tell them because you have different culture and you speak with different accent; therefore, you do not deserve to be called American? Personally, I have known many people who migrated to US and never had I heard they are being treated differently by the US govenment. Perhaps socially....but that is because WE like to see outselves as being different.
In country like Pakistan, race was not the issue but then religion and ideology are the dividing wall between the people. Can you see, even when we have the same skin color, we will all only see our differences rather than similarities.
It is not about equality or inequality but the basic HUMAN RIGHT. Why should an immigrant who is a Muslim or converted be getting the BUMIPUTRA rights BUT non-malays who are born and raised here for many generations still being rejected of the MALAYSIAN RIGHTS? Are these muslim immigrants more Malaysian than those non-malay or non-muslim who eat nasi lemak everyday for breakfast?
written by Molineux, June 25, 2009
Human have rights, right to be free from the boundaries set by the devious power hungry manipulators. One official religion, one official language, what bullshit? In the Malaysian context, why not make everyone use Mandarin compulsory? In one generation all New Malaysian can speak and understand the language of the most populous nation in the world and gain the huge economic advantage of such policy. We are so lucky that we have enough Chinese Malaysian to teach our poor fellow Malays and Indians. You see, an argument can always be made up. Why Not?
Why not indeed? Look at China, one language one race and you have the "gang of four".
Open your minds, I say.
written by toh leong, June 25, 2009
By Datuk Dr. Agoes Salim
Part I
I THINK we are farther apart now than we were in 1969.
But you have to remember that I grew up going to an English school, to a university where there were people of all races. At that time, although we did think in terms of race, it wasn’t in the way people do now. We felt that we were Malayans. We socialised much better than we do now.
Bahasa Malaysia can be a unifying factor. But it can be a factor separating people, too.
As Sukarno would say, “The important thing is the jiwa.”
You don’t have to have a common language, if you have the same jiwa (heart, spirit, passion, devotion). This is what we don’t have right now.
In 1956, the historical society of Universiti Malaya went to India.
There were lots of Indians in the group, but they didn’t think of themselves as Indians, they thought of themselves as Malayans.
That’s the jiwa. But later on, because of certain reactions, suddenly people stayed away from this jiwa — they don’t feel as though they are fully Malaysian. They are made to feel that way.
When I was in the service, there were lots of non-Malays in the civil service, holding good positions. But do you see them now? If you go to the universities, where are the non-Malay professors?
After 1969, suddenly there was this drive to make sure that all university vice-chancellors and faculty deans were Malay. So, in the end, we chased away all the best brains among the non-Malays.
When schools say you must start school with a doa (Muslim prayer recitation), you push away all the non-Muslims. When I was at school, we never had any prayers. Whatever we learnt in religious class was a separate thing.
I think it’s more important that we bring people together, rather than pushing religion so hard that it alienates other people. This is what’s happening. I can’t blame the Chinese and Indians; why should they go to a sekolah kebangsaan (national school), when they have to do all these things?
written by orang_melaka, June 25, 2009
Untuk lebih jelas, Melayu yang UMNO maksudkan bukanlah semua Melayu, hanya UMNOputra sahaja.
written by Aries, June 25, 2009
If that comes to fruition, children of future Malaysia would be led to believe that there are diferent types of unity in Malaysia:
- Malay / Muslim Unity
- Chinese / Buddhist / Christian / Muslim / Taoist / Hindu / Bahai / Others
- Indian / Hindu / Buddhist / Hare Krishna / Sri Ram / Christian / Bahai / etc., etc
- Kadazandusun / Muslim / Christian / etc.
- Iban / Muslim / Christian / Bahai / etc...
- Others / others...
What kind of UNITY is the PM trying to create in Malaysia? Only God knows.
written by Ellese A, June 25, 2009
The crux of the question are these: Are we ready to be non-discriminatory? Are we ready to close chinese, religious, tamil school for the sake of unity? Are we ready to dismantle chinese, bumi and indian business network? Are we ready to employ people not because of their language, racial and religious background? Do we conduct business and transaction with one because they can speak the same language or from same race or religion? Are all these not discriminatory practices?
Main important question is our school system. If our children from young stay apart do you expect them to be one malaysian when they are adult? Why then people who support different school systems are not the perpretators of a racial regime?
We have so many prejudices. You answer yourself and see whether we are ready. Perhaps we should start with Malaysian Insider writers who purport this agenda. Do they send their children to vernacular or religious schools? Then we know where they and then the people stand.
written by toh leong, June 26, 2009
All the things are breaking down. Our school system is not as it used to be. We are producing supposedly so many students with so many As, but what do they know? Are we happy about it? The leaders seem to be happy about it.
We came up with the Rukun Negara because, after 1969, there was the feeling that the nation was breaking down. People had forgotten what it was all about. So, we thought we could bring people back together — unite them. That’s what the first part of the Rukun Negara is about: the objectives of the nation.
Unfortunately, we did practically nothing to promote an understanding of the Rukun Negara. And when schools make mistakes, nobody corrects them. That should have been the role of the Department of Information.
In the beginning, Tan Sri Ghazali Shafie did try to apply the test of whether something was in consonance with the Rukun Negara or not. But then, the government just forgot about this.
We are supposed to be a united nation, not only in terms of state, but also in terms of people: that they would all consider themselves as Malaysians, and that this was their country and their nation. We wanted all these people to share the wealth of the nation.
One of the things we thought contributed to ’69 was the economic disparities, joblessness.
The New Economic Policy was a policy for all Malaysians; not just for the Malays. But we wanted to restructure the economy so that the Malays would come out of the rural agriculture sector into the commercial sector.
We wanted Malay participation at all levels of economic activity. We wanted to uplift the Malays without reducing the position of the others.. — “eradicating poverty regardless of less”.
And this was supposed to be in a situation of growth. Not just sharing the existing cake, but the cake must grow, so that these people also have the opportunity to grow.
At the same time, we also hoped that the Malays would grow a little faster. So, they set this target of 30 per cent equity in 20 years. I was not much in favour of that because I didn’t think it was achievable. I felt that participation was more important than wealth.
We never thought that we would produce multi-billionaires. That was never the intention of the NEP. If some people can come up as everyone comes up, it’s okay. But it wasn’t supposed to be about some people getting contracts.
We did say that we should have Malay millionaires just as we should have Chinese and Indian millionaires, but not so much so that you don’t have to do anything.
You must differentiate between dominance and domination. As Tun Dr Ismail said, “We want to be dominant, but we don’t want to dominate.”
Dominant in the sense that we wanted the Malays to be everywhere; but not to dominate all the others.
But we seem to be dominating; and I don’t think that’s healthy for the nation. It’s not about taking your share and not caring about the rest.
written by SL, June 26, 2009
Physical proximity is definitely a strategy towards unity of a nation, without doubts. But, do our systems allow such consistency? Talking about vernacular school, how about MRSM, Kolej Matriculasi and MARA? Aren't they causing our young generation to stay apart during the most important phase towards adulthood? So, I guess mere physical proximity does not work for our country, what do you think about it?
As mentioned by some, sense of belonging is the best method to unite all Malaysians. But, will a youngster has a sense of belonging when he or she is alienated or discriminated along his/her path towards adulthood? If I am studying at an international school, does it make me less Malaysian? If I am studying at Chinese Independent High School, does it make me less Malaysian? If I am studying at Government School, does it make me more Malaysian then the rest? Are all Malaysians will be more Malaysian-ed if all vernacular schools, international schools, private schools, private colleges and universities being closed down and all the younger generations are brought up in "one national educational system"?
I doubt so.
written by HJ Angus, June 26, 2009
Make sure you register to vote.
written by mujaddidabrar, July 10, 2009
written by CinaIndial, November 24, 2009
Like a person (no need to mention his/her name) who left a foolish comment above
While condemning mono ethnic institutions such as MRSM, matriculation colleges and UiTM for being a culprit for national unity, he/she shamelessly defend the existence of bloody racist institutions such as vernacular primary and secondary schools.
No wonder bumiputras keep their eyes cautiously on non bumiputras, cause they know they aren't kind of people to be trusted.




