China’s show trial splits Communist Party — Ma Jian
AUG 22 — The trial, conviction and suspended death sentence of Gu Kailai, the wife of purged Chinese leader Bo Xilai, has called into question not only China’s legal system but the very unity of the Communist Party leadership.
Let us begin with the many questions raised at the trial. For starters, Gu claimed that she killed the British businessman Neil Heywood only to protect her son. But, given Gu’s power as Mr Bo’s wife, she could have had someone such as Heywood jailed or expelled from China at the snap of her fingers. No need for cyanide.
Still, she not only admitted her guilt but seemed to embrace it as a sort of historical necessity. “In order to uphold the sanctity of the law,” she told the court, “I am willing to accept and calmly face whatever judgement I am given, and I also expect a fair and just judgement.”
Not since Stalin’s show trials of the 1930s has a defendant so effusively praised a judge who seemed bound to condemn her at a trial where no witness or evidence against her was presented.
The bitter irony of Gu’s high-speed trial is that she was a true believer in China’s legal system. Indeed, following a victory in an American court, Gu, a lawyer, wrote a book in which she claimed that China provides “the fairest method of trial”. She continued: “Chinese lawyers would not quibble over the meaning of each little word. Once they are sure that you murdered someone, you will be arrested, judged and executed by firing squad.”
Indeed, Gu was an avatar of the Maoist form of legality that China has maintained long after Mao’s death. Having failed the entrance examination to Peking University, Gu was nonetheless granted an exception and admitted to read law soon after the Communist Party restored the law departments. Prior to that, she sold pork in a Beijing market, where she earned the nickname Yi dao zhun, meaning that she could hack off a desired slice of meat with one blow.
Gu was one of the first lawyers to receive her licence. But, with the Tiananmen Square incident of 1989, the authorities clamped down on the profession’s autonomy. The party reasserted control over every aspect of justice through a core department: the Communist Party Central Committee’s Political and Legal Affairs Committee (PLAC).
This totalitarian organ has no known address, yet it manages China’s police, prosecutors, courts and Justice Ministry, and it appoints their leadership. All lawyers fall under its remit. Most important, all local PLAC secretaries simultaneously lead the local public security bureau. Small wonder, then, that the artist Ai Weiwei could be detained in secret, Liu Xiaobo could be sentenced to 11 years in prison for starting a petition, and Li Wangya could “commit suicide” while in custody.
But even this monolithic system of control is porous. Had Wang Lijun, the former Chongqing police commissioner and close ally of Bo Xilai, not feared for his life and fled to the United States’ consulate in Chengdu, Gu would still be helping Mr Bo to rule the city.
Mr Wang is no saint. Before he became Mr Bo’s police commissioner, he was the director of the Field Psychology Research Centre, where the condemned were executed and their live organs removed. Mr Wang’s paper, “A Study of Organ and Receptor Transplantation after Execution by Injection”, earned him the Guanghua Innovation Contribution Award. In the paper, he credits “our achievements” to the “thousands of transplantations”.
Given his familiarity with the brutality of the Chinese system, Mr Wang no doubt understood that, after falling out with Gu and Mr Bo, the US consulate might be the only place he could find safety.
After all, when it came to the public security organs, the courts and the prison system, Gu always had the final say. She acted as her husband’s adviser for cracking down on crime and corruption, and was responsible for sending two people, including the PLAC secretary in Wushan County, to prison.
In fact, a few days after killing Heywood, Gu donned a major-general’s uniform (which could have belonged to her father, Gen Gu Jingsheng), convened police officers in Chongqing and falsely claimed that she had received a secret order from the Ministry of Public Security to protect Mr Wang’s personal safety. The uniform, perhaps, was intended to intimidate the Chongqing police.
But, in a strange and unexplained twist, Mr Wang was whisked from the consulate to Beijing, where he presented the party leadership with the evidence that brought about Mr Bo’s downfall and Gu’s arrest.
But revealing the skeletons in Mr Bo’s closet also meant revealing the secret world of the “red aristocracy”. So Mr Wang can expect no leniency at his trial, which will most likely end with a commuted death sentence and forced labour.
In order to protect the red aristocracy, the PLAC made no mention during Gu’s trial of her myriad economic crimes. So, in the PLAC’s rewrite of history, Heywood was murdered so that Gu could protect her son, Bo Guagua.
And Mr Wang did not defend China’s honour by revealing Mr Bo’s and Gu’s criminality, but he aired his stories to hostile foreign forces. Only through his punishment can popular indignation be contained.
But the Bo Xilai and Gu Kailai affair may only be a prologue because the only clear truth to emerge from it is that the party leadership is fractured. The wolves are now turning on each other. — Bangkok Post
* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insider.