Side Views

PTPTN loan is good, but ... — Stephen Ng

APRIL 24 — It was on November 1, 1997 when the National Higher Education Loan (PTPTN) scheme started giving out loans. At that point in time, private colleges were starting to bloom, and foreign universities such as Monash University and Nottingham University were also invited to set up their campuses in Malaysia.

The PTPTN was created to be a rolling fund to provide loans to students who could not afford tertiary education, because very few banks in those days were willing to provide the loans. Even banks were charging higher interest fees for students who opted for the loans compared to the PTPTN.

Besides, the cost of private education is higher than that offered by the public sector. This is understandable, because they are linked with international universities and were catering to a generation of students who would have otherwise opted to go overseas. There was also no government funding to make available teaching equipment in these private universities.

I remember former Health Minister Dr Chua Soi Lek visiting a medical faculty in a private college. He made such a big fuss, complaining that the facilities for the newly set up medical faculty were not on par with the public universities. In my heart, I asked: “In the first place, how much has the government provided in soft loans to these private colleges?” Dr Chua, of course, never helped to fight for government funding to boost private education sector.

As I see it now, with the exception of certain colleges, the private education sector has in fact met the aspirations of the young people of Malaysia. Because of the PTPTN, many students have been able to pursue their education. Otherwise, they would not have been able to continue their education overseas, or even locally in the public universities due to the quota system.

My question therefore is why is the PTPTN now the subject of ridicule?

The more I think about it, the more I see the reason for the student protest. When I reflect over the current development where students and graduates are now protesting against the PTPTN, I think the grouse does not only lie with the fault of the PTPTN.

I see it as the students’ failure to communicate their grouses more effectively to fellow Malaysians. The way I look at it, I can now summarise for them in a few points:

● The standard of public universities has indeed dropped so low over the years that parents are reluctant these days to send their kids to pursue their degree in any of the public universities. They rather send their children to Singapore than to place them in a local public university.

● Because of this vacuum created in public tertiary education, the private education sector has indeed seen tremendous growth over the years. Some of these colleges continue to expand and make tonnes of money, while others have consolidated their positions and set up foundations to manage the institutions for perpetuity sake. This is where profits are being pumped back into the institutions.

● The fact that the younger generation is left to fend for themselves is what I believe the young people are sore about with the BN government. While the burden is now shifted from the parents, it is the children who have to pay the loan. Upon getting a job, the first loan that they have to service is the PTPTN loan! Don’t you think this is scary for the young ones?

● An average fresh graduate in the job market will have three big loans hanging around his neck: (a) bank loan for a car (b) bank loan for a house or apartment to set up a family (c) the PTPTN loan, which is not even tax deductible. Besides, their salaries are not any better than their counterparts in Singapore.

● While they are suffering, we are watching how taxpayers’ money is going into a black hole. Just a good example, we do not see the government making serious efforts to recover RM250 million from the failed project owned by the family of Shahrizat Jalil. And the latest news report involving Nedim Nazri, son of a minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, who was driving around in a sports car. Plus, Tajudin Ramli’s debt that was written off by the government.

I see much of what’s happening today has its roots in the era of Dr Mahathir Mohamad. He has created a culture that is hard to unwind. Even the PTPTN chief has failed to see the young people’s viewpoint, thinking that the PTPTN has indeed done a great favour for the nation, when what could have been better was for the government to spend taxpayers’ money on human capital development.

Good quality education is a better investment for the future of our country. If we cannot even invest in the education of our young Malaysians, where would be head towards as a nation?

As PKR strategist Rafizi Ramli had said, it only takes an additional RM2 billion from Petronas money to invest in the human capital development of young Malaysians.

Therefore, young Malaysians, I am with you.

* Stephen Ng reads The Malaysian Insider. He has some experience in the private education sector.

* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication. The Malaysian Insider does not endorse the view unless specified.



Please refrain from nicknames or comments of a racist, sexist, personal, vulgar or derogatory nature, or you may risk being blocked from commenting in our website. We encourage commenters to use their real names as their username. As comments are moderated, they may not appear immediately or even on the same day you posted them. We also reserve the right to delete off-topic comments