The Malaysian Insider

World

Jury to decide sticky issues of Sept 11 airlines lawsuit

Sep 11, 2012

The Tribute in Light illuminates the sky over New York’s lower Manhattan skyline a day ahead of the 11-year anniversary of the 9/11 attacks as the American flag is unfurled in Brooklyn, September 10, 2012. — Reuters picNEW YORK, Sept 11 — Most of the lawsuits arising from the hijacked plane attacks on the World Trade Centre 11 years ago have been settled, but one demanding that United Airlines and American Airlines be held liable for loss of property and business could go to trial.

Two recent rulings by a federal judge in New York denying the airlines’ bid to dismiss the lawsuit over a narrow insurance dispute have opened the door to the entire case ending up in the hands of a jury.

At issue is whether the two airlines and other defendants should pay additional damages to Larry Silverstein, the leaseholder of the World Trade Centre property, beyond what he has already received from his own insurer.

Silverstein’s World Trade Centre Properties blamed United — now United Continental Holdings Inc — and American Airlines for breaches of security. The 2008 lawsuit also named aircraft manufacturer Boeing Co, the Massachusetts Port Authority, which manages Logan International Airport, and security companies.

The lawsuit claimed that negligence allowed hijackers to board two planes at the Boston airport and use them as missiles to destroy the 110-story twin towers and cause other buildings on the site in lower Manhattan to burn down.

Before Sept 11, the airlines and the security companies they hired oversaw security at airports and on planes. That responsibility now lies with the Transportation Security Administration, a government agency.

Silverstein is seeking US$8.4 billion (RM26 billion) in damages for loss of property and lost business, even though US District Judge Alvin Hellerstein has limited the amount to the US$2.8 billion Silverstein paid for the leases.

The lawsuit is among the last pieces of litigation resulting from the attacks of Sept 11, 2001, which killed more than 3,000 people in New York, the Pentagon outside Washington, and Pennsylvania.

Lawsuits brought by relatives of those killed, people left injured, first responders, clean-up workers and some businesses have been settled.

Hellerstein, who sits in a courthouse less than a mile from the World Trade Centre site, has presided over almost all Sept 11 litigation.

On August 31, he denied the airlines’ motion for judgment on whether US$4 billion that Silverstein recovered from his insurers more than compensated for the potential damages recovery of US$2.8 billion against the airlines, saying it was an issue for a jury to decide at trial. He did not set a trial date.

Last Thursday, he denied the airlines’ request for an evidentiary hearing on the same issue.

Yesterday, lawyers for World Trade Centre Properties wrote a letter to the judge asking him to schedule “an all-issues trial”, including the liability of the airlines.

Money was sitting in the accounts of the defendants’ insurers earning interest “instead of helping to rebuild the World Trade Centre”, the letter said.

The aviation defendants’ liability insurance is estimated at more than US$10 billion, according to court documents.

No double dipping

Under New York law, if a plaintiff has been compensated for economic loss by a “collateral source” such as an insurance company, the plaintiff cannot recover compensation again in a tort lawsuit.

The airlines argue that Silverstein has already been reimbursed by his insurers well above what he paid the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey for the 99-year lease on the property, just two months before the 2001 attacks.

Donald Mark, an aviation lawyer with Fafinski Mark & Johnson near Minneapolis-St.Paul, Minnesota, said there was a question under the collateral source law of “whether any other payments to the plaintiffs would be double dipping”.

Mark, who is not involved in the case, said the judge’s ruling “indicated quite clearly that he needs to hear more and I’m assuming there will be a lot of expert testimony.”

A new complex to replace the World Trade Center is taking shape. The 6.5-hectare site is owned by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which is rebuilding the complex with Silverstein. The total cost is US$14.8 billion.

Financial services firm Cantor Fitzgerald is also suing American Airlines over lost business and the destruction of its offices in the World Trade Centre. The firm said in a court filing last March it was seeking between US$464 million and US$488.8 million in property damages.

American Airlines Flight 11 struck the north tower, killing 658 Cantor employees. United Airlines Flight 175 crashed into the south tower.  — Reuters